DON'T THROW MUD, COMMITTE

ISLAMABAD: The committee of Pakistan (ECP) has rejected the allegations leveled by Prime Minister Imran Khan and said that it had been saddened by the statements of the Prime Minister and therefore the ministers, adding that they ought to not throw mud on the state institutions. Is it not an open contradiction that on an equivalent day, under an equivalent roof, within the presence of an equivalent staff within the same constituency, those that won those that were rejected, those that won? Every party and person should have the spirit of admitting defeat. If there's any disagreement, come and talk with evidence. If they will hear your suggestions, why not complaints. If anyone has any objection to the orders/decisions of the committee. So allow them to take the constitutional path and allow us to work freely.

We can ignore the constitution and therefore the law and not amend it for the pleasure of anyone. consistent with details, a high-level meeting was persisted Friday under the chairmanship of Chief Election Commissioner Sikandar Sultan Raja. The meeting was held.

A statement issued after the meeting said that it had been sad to listen to the views expressed by the media through the media after the Senate election results. Any delegation that wanted to satisfy the committee heard their views on their suggestions. Detailed review.

The committee listens to everyone but carries out its duties only within the light of the Constitution and rules and makes decisions independently with no pressure to market democracy among the people of Pakistan. It is astonishing that on an equivalent day, under an equivalent roof, within the presence of an equivalent staff within the same electorate, those that won, those that won, those that won, those that passed, isn't that an open contradiction? While the results of all the opposite provinces are accepted, the result on which comment and displeasure are expressed is rejected by the committee. This is the sweetness of democracy and free elections and secret ballots that the entire nation saw and this was the intention of the constitution. What prevented the views expressed from being gone by the Parliament while the function of the committee isn't to legislate but to uphold the law. If the constitutional institutions still are
ridiculed in this way, it's tantamount to their weakness and not that of the committee.