JUSTICE FAIZ DISMISSES CASE AGAINST WIFE
Orders and reports cannot be considered, nor can any further action be taken against Justice Faiz Issa, his wife, and their children in any forum or authority, including in the Supreme Judicial Council. Judge Faiz Issa's Civil Petition No. 296/2020 has been disposed of in the ratio of five to five. Justice Yahya Afridi in his separate note regarding the petition stated that the details of the summary judgment will be recorded later, except for the civil petition of Justice Qazi Faiz Issa. No. 296/2020 (in which, Justice Yahya Afridi had declared that a judge Should not be an applicant) All these applications are accepted. He also stated in his judgment that this court, while reconsidering paragraphs 4 to 11 of the judgment of the Supreme Court dated June 19, 2020, in Constitutional Petition No. 17/2019, annulled this judgment and in these paragraphs, this constitutional petition and related matters Declare illegal and ineffective all actions, measures, orders, information, and reports that have been issued since the issuance of this judgment, which was issued in the brief judgment and later described in the detailed judgment. As a result, no such action, action, order or report can be considered, nor can any further action be taken in any forum or authority, including the Supreme Judicial Council. In the case, Justice Manzoor Ahmad Malik and Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Mian Khel reversed their earlier decision. Justice during the hearing Faiz Issa asked the bench headed by Justice Umar Ata Bandial whether he was the complainant, adding that he was violating the oath by putting his questions in the mouth of the public prosecutor, to which Justice Umar Ata Bandial said that in Justice Faiz's views I am wrong to review his wife's documents, the court should hear only one position. Meanwhile, Khushdal Khan, vice chairman of the Pakistan Bar Council, termed the decision a victory for law and justice. According to details, headed by Justice Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Maqbool Baqir, Justice Manzoor Ahmed Malik, Justice Mazhar Alam Mian Khel, Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, Justice Muneeb Akhtar, Justice Yahya Afridi, Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed and A 10-member full-court larger bench comprising Justice Aminuddin Khan heard the case on Monday. Justice Qazi Faiz Issa appeared with his wife Serena Issa and daughter. Additional Attorney General Amir Rehman continued his arguments of the previous day. He took the position that the federal government is the official party in this case, on this basis the apex court had issued a notice to the federal government seeking a reply. He said that the federal government had not filed a review petition on the annulment of the reference, the court had annulled the reference due to negligence in legal matters. He said the court had ruled that the reference had been filed without giving Serena Isa a chance to explain. He said that if the court had not referred the case to the FBR for further investigation, the federal government would have filed a review petition.
The case is justified in defending the transfer to the FBR. He said that the decision of the court, in this case, has been implemented, after which the decision cannot be withdrawn. He said that the Supreme Judicial Council could not be prevented from reviewing any material, adding that the proceedings of the Supreme Judicial Council could not be challenged under Article 211 of the Constitution. He also said that the Supreme Court cannot interfere in the work of the Supreme Judicial Council. He said that from day one we have been of the view that the court has not given any direction to the Judicial Council. Honorable Judge and judicial credentials demanded that the issue be resolved, on which Justice Faiz Issa "Are you a complainant?" to which he replied that the suffering our family has been suffering for the last two years. During the hearing, Serena Issa said that Justice Umar Ata Bandial and Justice Muneeb Akhtar are working hard for our accountability. The Additional Attorney General further said that former Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry was suspended as Chief Justice and the facts of this case are completely different from the case of Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry. He said that the petitioner Justice Faiz Issa was making the FBRK proceedings malicious and was making it a basis for review. He said that it was his right to give arguments on the documents which are the basis for review. I'm wasting. He said that the documents I was quoting were not from the FBR report while according to the rules, the bench of the apex court has the power to ask questions. The apex court may also ask for affidavits to check certain facts. The court asked me to answer three questions and those three questions are the basis of the whole case, if the petitioner, Justice Qazi Faiz Issa He said that the independence of the judiciary is conditional on the accountability of the judges. A case of offshore properties of a judge's family has come to light, though the reference in the Supreme Judicial Council has been annulled. Still intact He said that in order to restore the confidence of the people in the judiciary, it was necessary to end this dispute and the Supreme Judicial Council was the relevant forum for resolving this dispute. He said that the apex court has not given any direction to the Supreme Judicial Council in its decision. As the case is pending in the Supreme Court, the FBR has not done anything in this regard and it is also being assumed that R will not take any action. He said that no error has been identified in the decision of the court, even if there is a legal error in the decision, it cannot be reviewed, no order of the Supreme Court has affected the FBR, he informed the court. What that Justice Qazi Faiz Issa, Ms. Serena Issa, Balochistan Bar Association, Supreme Court Bar Association, Punjab Bar Council, Quetta Bar Association, PFUJ against which the report was ordered to be placed before the Supreme Judicial Council. And senior lawyer Abid Hassan Manto and others had filed these petitions for review. Meanwhile, the Vice Chairman of the Pakistan Bar Council, Khushdal Khan, termed the decision on the petitions for review of the Presidential Reference case filed against Justice Qazi Faiz as a victory of law and justice. He said in a statement issued on Monday that the Supreme Court had upheld the principles of supremacy of the Constitution, rule of law and independence of the judiciary by approving the petitions of Justice Qazi Faiz Issa, Serena Issa and lawyers' associations. ۔ He said that this decision was taken in future due to attacks on independent and sovereign judges by the administration or other institutions
0 Comments